Evaluation of Technical Assistance to Post-Conflict Countries-Mozambique and Rwanda

Author: International Monetary Fund

This evaluation of technical assistance (TA) in statistics covers two post-conflict countries, namely, Mozambique and Rwanda during the period 2000–08.

Volume/Issue: Volume 2009 Issue 012

Publication date:

ISBN:

Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase

Available Languages and Formats

Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Business and Economics , Computers , Economics- Macroeconomics , Business and Economics - Statistics , PP , TA mission , balance of payments , IMF TA , source data , TA coordinator , TA program , TA provider , donor-financed TA country coordinator , TA evaluation , Sta TA , recipient institution , TA delivery , TA absorption , Government finance statistics , Real sector statistics , Financial statistics , Africa

Also of interest

Review of Implementation of IMF Commitments in Support of the 2030 Agenda for...

2018 Review of Program Design and Conditionality

Implementing Board-Endorsed Recommendations From The 2024 External Evaluation...

The Case for A General Allocation Of SDRs during the Thirteenth Basic Period

Summary

This evaluation of technical assistance (TA) in statistics covers two post-conflict countries, namely, Mozambique and Rwanda during the period 2000–08. The TA, including training, covered the broad spectrum of the Statistics Department’s (STA) program, including collaboration with the East Africa Regional Technical Assistance Center (East AFRITAC), the U. K. Department for International Development (DFID), and the Japanese-funded General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) projects, as well as TA funded directly from the IMF’s budget. The emerging lessons also provide a useful guide to future TA to non-English-speaking countries. The evaluation is based on missions to each country and relied on responses to questionnaires, desk reviews of available data, and discussions with country authorities, donors, data users, and national officials who participated in IMF courses in statistics.