The Political Economy of Redistributive Social Security

An Analytical Framework

Population aging puts significant pressure on social security systems that are based mainly on a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) formula and determined by the political process in which both retirees and future retirees participate. This paper demonstrates that in an economic and demographic steady state, majoritarian democracy overspends on social security. It then shows that in case of demographic shock, the regular majority process can be paralyzed by the development of entrenched interest groups that could lose from majority decisions. Depending on the way these entrenched interests operate, they can be judged more or less desirable from the viewpoint of social justice.
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 1999 Issue 180
Publication date: December 1999
ISBN: 9781451859096
$20.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
Paperback
PDF
ePub
Mobi
English
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Business and Economics , Social Science , Investments and Securities-General , Labor , Demography , WP , tax rate , replacement ratio , social security , majority voting , entitlements , aging , replacement ratio retiree , workers vote , benefit rule , Lt worker , simple majority , Retirement , Wages , Pensions , Securities , Europe

Summary

Population aging puts significant pressure on social security systems that are based mainly on a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) formula and determined by the political process in which both retirees and future retirees participate. This paper demonstrates that in an economic and demographic steady state, majoritarian democracy overspends on social security. It then shows that in case of demographic shock, the regular majority process can be paralyzed by the development of entrenched interest groups that could lose from majority decisions. Depending on the way these entrenched interests operate, they can be judged more or less desirable from the viewpoint of social justice.